Что ты на это скажешь, КОКОМ?
May. 24th, 2021 11:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lafeberСсылка на радужные новости отечественной гип-пропаганды, но всё равно интересно.
Пишут, что внедряется «отечественная Система предупреждения столкновения в воздухе (СПСВ), аналог американской TCAS (Система предупреждения столкновения воздушных судов)».
https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/6522925.html
Аббревиатура TCAS смутно знакома. Вспоминаю, что шведы в 1975 году в обход технического эмбарго COCOM помогли СССР приобрести для московского авиаузла систему TERCAS (Terminal and En Route Control Automated System). Успели поставить как раз в аккурат под Олимпиаду.
Но TCAS – не TERCAS. Расшифровка аббревиатур разная, не смотря на схожее назначение систем – регулировать движение самолетов над аэропортом. Traffic alert and collision avoidance system – TCAS.
Абзац про TERCAS и разоблачение в 1981 году:
The sale of the latest hi-tech equipment was a completely different matter, however. In this regard, besides the turbofan engines, another good example involves the case of the Swedish firm, Datasaab Contracting. In 1975, this company concluded a contract with the Soviets to build a new Terminal and En Route Control Automated System (TERCAS) and applied to the US Department of Commerce for clearance for American made components. At a second attempt, in 1977, the request was approved provided that the system would contain no secondary radars19 and that certain limitations on hardware and software equipment would be met. After acquiring the company in 1981, LM Ericsson notified the US authorities that, contrary to undertakings given, Datasaab’s shipments included both primary and secondary radars, which were installed at seven monitoring sites including the airports at Kiev and Mineralnye Vody and supplied computerised data to the main control centre at Moscow Vnukovo airport for semi-automatic area tracking. For this ‘treacherous conduct… accomplished in a… deceitful manner,’ as the Judge Gerhard A. Gesell of the federal district court for Washington, DC, stated during the case, the Datasaab was in April 1984 fined $3.1 million. This was equivalent in value to all the US components in the $75 million contract. To the verdict, Ericsson ‘pleaded no contest.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981115/
Пишут, что внедряется «отечественная Система предупреждения столкновения в воздухе (СПСВ), аналог американской TCAS (Система предупреждения столкновения воздушных судов)».
https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/6522925.html
Аббревиатура TCAS смутно знакома. Вспоминаю, что шведы в 1975 году в обход технического эмбарго COCOM помогли СССР приобрести для московского авиаузла систему TERCAS (Terminal and En Route Control Automated System). Успели поставить как раз в аккурат под Олимпиаду.
Но TCAS – не TERCAS. Расшифровка аббревиатур разная, не смотря на схожее назначение систем – регулировать движение самолетов над аэропортом. Traffic alert and collision avoidance system – TCAS.
Абзац про TERCAS и разоблачение в 1981 году:
The sale of the latest hi-tech equipment was a completely different matter, however. In this regard, besides the turbofan engines, another good example involves the case of the Swedish firm, Datasaab Contracting. In 1975, this company concluded a contract with the Soviets to build a new Terminal and En Route Control Automated System (TERCAS) and applied to the US Department of Commerce for clearance for American made components. At a second attempt, in 1977, the request was approved provided that the system would contain no secondary radars19 and that certain limitations on hardware and software equipment would be met. After acquiring the company in 1981, LM Ericsson notified the US authorities that, contrary to undertakings given, Datasaab’s shipments included both primary and secondary radars, which were installed at seven monitoring sites including the airports at Kiev and Mineralnye Vody and supplied computerised data to the main control centre at Moscow Vnukovo airport for semi-automatic area tracking. For this ‘treacherous conduct… accomplished in a… deceitful manner,’ as the Judge Gerhard A. Gesell of the federal district court for Washington, DC, stated during the case, the Datasaab was in April 1984 fined $3.1 million. This was equivalent in value to all the US components in the $75 million contract. To the verdict, Ericsson ‘pleaded no contest.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7981115/
